It took the City awhile to gain Green Community status.  In April, Peabody received $271,500 that  must be spent before applications for grant funds can be submitted. The  next grant opportunity is Spring 2025.

      At a meeting of the Committee on Energy Efficiency  and Renewable Energy on July 11, Director of Community Development Curt Bellavance explained the plan to spend the $271,500 designation grant.  He reported an assessment of city-owned buildings has been conducted and that the City worked with National Grid on heating issues and with PMLP on lighting issues.  Weatherization priorities were identified, including some low priority buildings with an uncertain future: the curent police station and high school.

      One of the higher priority buildings for weatherization work is Peabody City Hall.   The cost of the improvements is estimated at $54,000 and, of that, $34,000 will be funded by National Grid; the remainder will be paid by rhe Green Community Designation Grant.

      A lighting project to be funded is for the Torigian Life Center.  “We are trying to maximize the benefit of working with the grant funding available from National Grid,” said Bellavance.  “We believe there’s going to be a good payback on that work.”

     Another potential priority for some city buildings is heat pumps. Over the summer break, work done for schools was estimated to result in savings of $25,000.

     The Subcommittee requested Bellavance return to the council to provide updates on existing projects and grant application ideas for submission in the Spring.

https://www.mass.gov/…/map-of-current-green…/download

Peabody: Green Communities and Beyond 5/16/24

by Mark Dullea

If you’re reading this, there’s a good chance that you’re someone who is concerned about the earth’s rising temperature and all of the devastating results of that heat gain: wildfires, many declared out of control, near and far; rising sea levels; unbearable levels of heat where people have always been able to live before; drought conditions; reduced agricultural production; the decline of necessary species, such as bees and other pollinators; and much more.

Here in Peabody, we’re giving credit to the City for joining the ranks of some 300 cities and towns in Massachusetts who have become, over the last dozen or so years, designated Green Communities. That’s a fine accomplishment, and we ought to give credit where credit is due.

But. . . . . . .we can’t stop there. There’s still so much to do at the City level to get us up there with the leaders in municipal climate action. We need a number of official City responses to the situation that we in Peabody, and everyone around the world, have to face and to overcome. Such as: a Declaration of Climate Emergency would be a good start. We need specific goals which quantify How Much, and By What Year. We need someone, knowledgeable of the multiple issues involved – a Sustainability Director of Climate Planning Coordinator – to be employed at the highest levels of City government, and given a staff. We need an officially appointed Citizens Climate Advisory Committee or Task Force as major participants. We need to develop and to officially adopt a broad-based Climate Action Plan, with input from all of Peabody’s elected offices, boards, and authorities. This Plan would hopefully be put together in recognition of the already completed climate plans of our neighboring communities. The Peabody Plan needs to contain clearly stated goals and targets; it needs to have the data needed for sound decision-making and prioritizing; It needs a program of specific efforts to be carried out, along with strategies and funding sources – that sort of thing. A wider array of what city governments around the world have been doing to fight climate change – some going back as far as the early 1990s – can be found on my website: www.climateplanning.city

But all this may take a while to put into place, even if we start early tomorrow.

So here’s something that we can do right away. There is a federal grant program – part of the multi-hundreds-of-billions of dollars Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 – called Solar For All (SFA). SFA has just committed $156,000,000 (that’s 156 million) to the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. You can read the details at www.epa.gov/greenhouse-gas-reduction-fund/solar-all These funds can go to public, private, and nonprofit entities that submit a winning grant application. The money is to be used for rooftop and other onsite solar installations and for community solar projects. A special emphasis of any proposal needs to be placed on low-to-moderate income, multi-family housing complexes. Battery storage of solar power, and microgrids are not yet specifically included, but advocates for each are currently having discussions with Mass DOER officials to try and add them. I hope this happens. I’m following it closely. Peabody should be actively pursuing a share of this money. Why should we just sit back and let it all go elsewhere?

Over the last few days I’ve been emailing outlines of this proposal to the Mayor, to the members of the City Council’s Committee on Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, to the Peabody Municipal Light Plant, and to the Peabody Housing Authority, which owns and manages over 500 of the type of housing units that are targeted by Solar For All funding. It’s vitally necessary that these 4 entities – Mayor, the Council, PMLP, and the PHA – all sit down together and come up with a plan to bring clean solar power to these and possibly other comparable housing complexes. Among these offices there are enough smart people to figure out how to craft a successful plan and grant application. If asked, I can suggest companies who do this kind of work, who can become involved at the appropriate point in the proceedings. If you believe that’s it’s time for Peabody to put real boots on the ground, climatically speaking, I’m hoping that you see the value of my proposal, and that you’ll do what you can to bring it into the open and move it forward.

I’m Mark Dullea. My wife, Donna Qualters and I live at 8 Longview Way, right opposite Tilly’s Farm. We believe our house was the first in Peabody to install solar panels, way back in 2012. We’ve since removed all of our home’s fossil-fueled heating equipment and appliances, replacing them with heat pumps, electric water heating, and an induction stove. I’m a retired urban planner with a long involvement in renewable energy and, more recently, climate planning at the local government level. I do some climate journalism, mainly for city and regional magazines. I volunteer several hours each week as a kind of climate technical advisor to an organization called Mass. Interfaith Power & Light. MassIPL is a nonprofit that assists churches, dioceses, and various other religious – run entities to decarbonize their building stock and their entire operations. I’ve helped them establish a Geeen Fund, and am working on MassIPL’s own Solar For All program and grant application. Please feel free to contact me with any comments, suggestions, revisions, etc., to the proposal I’m introducing here. 978-314-3301 markd9x9@gmail.com

– BCNS/Sudi Smoller – I agree with Commissioner Lazares. We are only trying to get more information. Can’t you see how you come across as being untransparent? Because, when we ask you things, you don’t tell us. And, that has long been the history of our relationship….I’m thrilled that we are involved in the battery project. I feel like you haven’t told anyone about it. The fact that it is one out of 14 communities.…Where exactly is it going? How will it impact Peabody? We haven’t heard any of that. And people want to hear that. And, when you say, send me an email and I’ll email you back, people don’t hear that.

– Commissioner Thomas D’Amato – At the risk of extending this, I get your point. This a cultural change….

-Audience Member – We can’t hear you. Use your microphone.

(D’Amato turns on his microphone and the sound in the room improves, but not on video, because the mics are not connected to the mixer.)

– D’Amato – It’s become a cultural thing. I used to remark that we liked to fly under the radar, great service…(inaudible)… You want us to be more public or higher profile. I don’t know if that can happen overnight. We have a new board; we have more tolerant board members. I understand but we’re not in the business of (inaudible) taking it public. We’re in the business of …(inaudible) service… and in due time, you’ll hear all that. But questions around an empty lot and wanting to know what that is, I don’t know what to say to that.

(referring to a question raised by Stewart Lazares earlier in the meeting.)

– BCNS, Sudi Smoller – We want to make sure that you are taking action towards a sustainable future that does not involve greenhouse gasses.

– D’Amato – Yea that’s part of it. That’s not our complete mantra. What’s going on today… is not going to happen overnight….

– BCNS, Sudi Smoller – It has to be part of all of our mantras.

– D’Amato – It’s part of our mantra… The federal government is writing checks it can’t cash. It’s part of our mantra. We can’t write checks that we can’t cash. I get it, but it’s not going to happen overnight.

– BCNS, Sudi Smoller – We have to keep chipping away at it…I think you have the best rates and great service. But, I think your mission statement has to be expanded. In today’s world, it has to be more than that. You have to give leadership to the future on

sustainability…(inaudible)….People are feeling like you’re not telling us the good or the bad.

– D’Amato – I think we’re doing as good as anybody. Do you think we’re not doing a good job?

– Commissioner Tracy Valletti – To Sudi’s point about emailing and people not hearing it because it is internal, can we treat that as correspondence and address it publicly?

-Joe Anastasi, PMLP Director – We can do a number of things but that is one of the reasons why we created and transitioned to the Energy Awareness Forum online – for that exact purpose to contain a list of questions and answers that the public has asked.

– BCNS, Sudi Smoller – The deadline (on the PMLP website) still says January 21.

– Anastasi – So, it’s out of date. You can still submit a question.

– BCNS, Sudi Smoller – And then, when will we see the answer? And then, once you publish it after 60 days, where does that answer go?

– Anastasi – Right there on the energy awareness age.

– BCNS, Sudi Smoller – Well, I can’t seem to find much information on that page. (BCNS checked the page on 3/30 and found the deadline has been updated to: If you ask a question and wish to follow up, please use our Contact Page or call Community Relations at 978-531-5975. https://pmlp.com/229/Energy-Awareness-Forum)

– Anastasi – It’s only because there’s only been two questions asked in two-and-a half ears.

– BCNS, Sudi Smoller – It’s a bit disheartening when we have to make a deadline and the latest deadline is last January for several months.

– Audience Member – If you don’t answer our questions, then we are really in trouble.

– Anastasi – In my opinion, actions speak louder than words. And, we have made every action in the right direction. If our words are not up to date then we apologize and we’ll be better at that. But, our actions have been unanimously fantastic for the last 50 years and no one is going to make us feel that we haven’t done enough because we’ve done more than almost everyone. We are ahead of the curve.

– BCNS, Sudi Smoller – And I’ve said you have, but for the one part: lack of public and community engagement. It’s about the future.

– Anastasi – I am very sorry that you feel that way but I disagree that we are not doing enough. I believe we are. I will always try to be better and that’s something that I take on every day of my life. So, we will be better but I don’t accept that we’re not good enough.

– BCNS, Sudi Smoller – The question that immediately comes to mind: Why are there three pages of public notices in the Weekly News this week from this board and you don’t say one word about it before this meeting or at this meeting. What any of that means,

people don’t understand. (Go to pages 12-14.

– Anastasi – Because a lot goes into those decisions and we barely got it out in time. You’ll find out more information is going to be available tomorrow.

– BCNS, Sudi Smoller – That’s like saying to me ‘you can see the budget once we pass it.’

– Anastasi – The newspaper article today is about Monday. So it’s not live until Monday.

– D’Amato – Can I add one thing because you have a feeling like we’re not forthcoming or whatnot – not public enough. I have a feeling sometimes like you are looking to trip us up. That we’re under the microscope, that you.. say nice things but it comes across….I can feel that we’re under the microscope with you guys within the last year and a half.

– BCNS, Sudi Smoller = Can I be frank. That’s because…

– Commissioner ? – asks “of 2015A?” (the new 60MW peaker)

– BCNS, Sudi Smoller – Because, you don’t share anything with us. You turn off the microphones. The way you treat us and treat public engagement is not very welcoming. So, we’re constantly feeling – we better get there early to make sure the microphones are not

missing again. We better get there early, so we can record this and then people don’t use their microphones so we can’t hear it. It seems no matter what we do, you all are trying to nix it. I’d like to get past that too but that’s been our history since we first found out about the Peabody Peaker. That’s been the history of our interactions. You still have not released your budget. You are publicly elected and you don’t let us see it or talk about it until it’s

been passed?

You ask why we seem to be resisting you? Because other boards don’t do that. They publish their budget. They have a way of communicating. They publish minutes in their entirety, not just a tweaking of the agenda. They record their meetings not necessarily on video but on audio.

– D’Amato – What if everything is the way you wanted and our rates were terrible and our service was terrible? Would that be good?

– BCNS, Sudi Smoller – I’d be here working to address that.

– BCNS: Ron Smoller – Regarding the forum, I truly believe that you are not aware…I’ve sent questions well ahead of what’s shown as the Jan 21 deadline. It’s March 28, there has not been a question posted, including questions that I did send you last September. There should have been a posting in December, it’s a quarterly forum. There should have been answers to questions in December, maybe there weren’t any, mine was before December but it was shortly after. There should been another one (posting) this month, March 21 would be the (traditional) deadline date. It should have been a posting of my questions I submitted before Jan 21. There’s nothing there.

– Anastasi – Every question that has been submitted through the forum is posted on the forum. If you send a question in another fashion it doesn’t …

– BCNS, Ron Smoller – I submitted through the forum, two questions, prior to Jan 21 and they’re still not there. That’s over 60 days. (The two questions, as of 3/30, were not on the update on the Energy Awareness Forum page.)

– Anastasi – I remember seeing them there.

– Audience member – Maybe they are gone now.

– Anastasi – Potentially, that is when we cut over to our new website, maybe.

– BCNS, Ron Smoller – They were meant to be on the Forum…

.Everything I have ever submitted to you ….. I have always followed your rules. I’m always trying to follow all of your rules. I don’t think they’re all great but I get it.

Peabody TV – 8:03 is where BCNS “remarks” begin. Stewart Lazares spoke just prior to 8:03.

The only thing holding Peabody back currently is the City Council and its apparent lack of interest in the city’s energy future. How is it that 290 other Massachusetts communities have found a way through the bureaucratic, but necessary, process and now enjoy grant funds and benefits as a Green Community?

BCNS is asking citizens to contact their city councilors before the next Council meeting on August 24 and inquire as to where the city is in the process of becoming a Green Community and ask he/she to take action to ensure our designation in time to apply for grant funds in the fall. Council Directory: https://www.peabody-ma.gov/government.html#!#tab1-0)

Still needed is a vote of the Legal Affairs Subcommittee (Members: O’Neill, McGinn, Peach, Rossignoll, Turco) regarding updating our building code to include new stretch building codes. This ensures that new buildings are designed and constructed with energy efficiency in mind. The predicted process requires inviting the Department of Community Development to appear before the subcommittee. To date, there are no council committee meetings scheduled in August. https://www.mass.gov/info-details/building-energy-code

The Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy subcommittee (Members: McGinn, Daigle, Welton) met last in May. The subcommittee’s endorsement, if made, will pass the Green Community application on to the full council for consideration. The next Council meeting is on August 24.

Curt Bellavance, Director of Community Development, reported that the City is finalizing the required energy audit of all public buildings and structures. “Once that is complete, we will engage a consultant to draft our energy reduction plan; I’m not sure how long that will take,” he said.

The City has considered becoming a Green Community three times before. In 2008, at the urging of the Friends of Green Peabody and Councilor Anne Manning-Martin, the city could not participate in the program as the designation was not applicable to cities with a municipal light plant. In 2011, the legislation was amended but to participate, the city would have to enter into a trust with the municipal light plant and charge residents a fee of $3. PMLP did not agree to the charge.

In 2022, those obstacles were eliminated because a municipality with at least one electric client serviced by the National Grid can qualify for designation – a fact that the Council learned when Tracy Valletti, presently a Peabody Municipal Light Commissioner, informed the committee.

https://itemlive.com/…/peabody-may-green-light-going…/

Resources:

https://www.mass.gov/info-details/being-a-green-community

https://www.mass.gov/…/map-of-290-gcs-and…/download

https://itemlive.com/…/peabody-may-green-light-going…/

https://patch.com/…/peabody-looking-to-become-a-green…

https://www.mass.gov/orgs/green-communities-division

What are the virtues of Peabody? Certainly its attractive property tax rate comes to mind.  A nice, City-owned golf course.  Then there’s the 275-acre Brooksby Farm, a working farm with a popular farm stand.  Then there’s a big regional shopping mall, and a well-established industrial/business park.  Then there’s, let’s see: good access to the 2200-acre Lynn Woods, laced with all those great hiking trails; ready access to foodie haven Beverly, with all those great restaurants on Cabot and Rantoul Street; and being next-door neighbors with Salem, with its funky, witch-obsessed downtown and its architecturally striking historic 18^th and 19^th-century neighborhoods.  And the beaches of Nahant, Lynn, and Gloucester are all just a short drive away.

What Peabody is NOT is a hotbed of action and elected leadership in the one area that is – or should be – the most important to everyone alive today around the globe: the matter of the global climate crisis.  In 2021 I prepared a report on what the 40 cities and towns that comprise the core of the Boston metropolitan area have been doing in the area of climate action: how they were responding to the 2016 Paris Climate Agreement.  This is the agreement that assessed the alarming effect of greenhouse gases accumulating in our planet’s atmosphere, and urged governments at all levels – including cities – to become more active collectively and individually to decarbonizes buildings and transport, and to up the pace of replacing fossil fuels with greener alternatives.  BOSTON Magazine published  a synopsized version of my work in April of 2021.

In my original and longer report, I established 20 markers, or indicators, of the types of municipal climate action I would use to evaluate the level of a community’s climate action.  Each indicator represented 5 points toward a perfect score of 100.  Cambridge finished in first place, checking 19 of my 20 boxes, for 95 points.  Peabody managed to check only one box, thereby scoring just 5 points, and finished dead last, 40^th place. We must do better.

Leading experts are calling the climate crisis an existential threat to humanity, and while many communities in The Commonwealth are responding to this threat head-on, like a lion on the hunt to feed its hungry pride, Peabody’s response might best be compared to the ostrich. Contrary to popular belief, ostriches do not bury their heads in the sand when they sense danger. What they actually do, which seems equally unproductive, is to run away from a predator until they run out of wind, and then flop to the ground and lie still,  hoping not to be seen by blending in with the terrain. My bet is on the predator at this point. Peabody seems to be taking this approach. While it may quietly acknowledge that rising temperatures and ecological decline will do us all in unless serious, broad-based collective action is taken, it has preferred, up to this point in time, anyway, to just lie low and let others take the steps required to keep the planet in a survivable temperature range.  

So it has not been surprising what occurred when MMWEC showed it was determined, based on a loophole in state law, to bull ahead with its ill-chosen and outdated plans for a fossil-fueled peaker plant (“the best technology of 2015!”).  While there was a strong level of citizen opposition, there was none from where it really mattered – Peabody City Hall or the offices of PMLP.  Both were content to sit back, to ignore the idea that better solutions to peak energy needs were being rapidly adopted around the globe, and enable the plant to be built despite overwhelming evidence of better alternatives.

However, just because Peabody has until the present day badly lagged the leaders – globally, nationally, and locally – in the area of municipal climate action, there is no reason to settle for remaining at the back of the field forever. There are many things Peabody can do, utilizing its own local assets, and beginning right now, to show that there IS concern in this city about the climate crisis. Not just rising temperatures, but everything that directly results from that: more frequent catastrophic storms; dangerously lowered public water supplies in many areas; devastating and ever-larger forest fires; overly acidified oceans; and all the rest that we hear about almost every day now.  It’s clearly time for all good citizens, and their elected representatives, to stop ignoring the obvious, and to take bold climate action while we can still.

It’s not as if Peabody is sitting surrounded by climate science deniers and hard-core fossil fuel advocates. For example, just last year Beverly and Salem’s mayors were recognized at the National Mayors Climate Protection Awards, bestowed by the U.S. Conference of Mayors. One of the many reasons these two received these awards is their Joint Beverly-Salem Climate Action and Resilience Plan & Program, called Resilient Together. They’ve put forth creative plans to address the climate crisis at the municipal level including using electric school buses to discharge their batteries during peak demand periods and building solar arrays on capped landfills. A much longer listing of both cities’ climate leadership and actions can be found in this article by the Salem News. Peabody has a NetZero Roadmap Plan in the works, which will address the ways Peabody can act towards climate action in similar ways as the Resilient Together plan, but ensuring its implementation is prioritized by the city and its partners will prove challenging based on the lackluster climate efforts so far.

And the timing couldn’t be better – as referenced to the “Golden Opportunity” in this article’s title. In 2022, with the passage of the federal government’s Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), hundreds of billions of dollars in investment tax credits (ITCs), production credits, grants, and other forms of financial assistance to climate projects became available. Cities, along with nonprofit organizations, who were earlier unable to capitalize on ITCs, can now receive comparable financial compensation under the Act’s Direct Payments feature. Combine the IRA with 2021’s Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA), with its own climate-related dollars available, and you are talking more than serious money.  Is Peabody really going to allow all of this to go elsewhere?  Even with the NetZero Roadmap in its final drafting phase, there’s a risk that Peabody will miss out on these funds without swift plan implementation. 

The orderly way for a city to go about becoming a grown-up about climate action would be to first appoint a broad-based citizens Task Force or Climate Advisory Committee; second, to carry out a detailed, city-wide greenhouse gas (GHG) inventory; and third, to create a comprehensive Climate Action Plan. The draft NetZero Roadmap Plan has done work around these three items, but there is more to be done. In the meantime, there are many things that it could start to do while steps 1, 2, and 3 are being pursued.  If you’d like an idea of the almost endless range of possible city climate actions that could be pursued, have a look at my website – www.climateplanning.city. There you’ll find climate actions and Climate Action Plans by cities around the world, some going back as far as the 1990s.  You’ll learn of the practices, policies, strategies, emerging technologies, and funding and financing assistance that are available to cities, and which are enabling them to reduce their carbon footprints and to help keep fossil fuels where they belong – in the ground.  Based on some of these ideas, and on Peabody’s own local assets, here are just a few ways to begin moving up into the of the ranks climate action leaders:

1. The City guided by the City Council’s Ad Hoc Committee on Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, is now involved in its 3^rd look at joining the Commonwealth’s Green Communities Program.  Of the 351 cities and towns in the state, nearly 300 have recognized the benefits of the program and taken the steps to become a certified Green Community – many as long as 12 years ago. It should be a no-brainer, a baby-step on the road to serious climate action.  Since its inception in 2010, Green Communities has distributed more than $153 Million to Massachusetts city and town governments.  Due to its ponderously slow evaluation of the program, and its current non-participation, not a penny of those funds has been received by Peabody. When joining the program was being considered for the 2^nd time in 2011, in order to participate as a city with its own electric utility, the City would have had to enter into a trust with PMLP and charge residents a fee of $3- about the price of a cup of coffee at Dunkin Donuts.  PMLP did not want to do this, and the Green Communities effort died.  It was brought up again at the Council Ad Hoc Committee back in April, 2022, but it was felt that more study was needed. The application is now “nearly complete” and should be voted on by the council this summer- should be. It’s possible that all the world’s glaciers will have melted away before any official decision is made by Peabody to actually adopt the Green Communities Program. 
2. Peabody is one of the very few cities I know of that that owns and runs its own farm – 2 farms, actually – Brooksby and Tillie’s. Regenerative soil management is considered a climate-positive farming method, as it retains more carbon in the soil than does tilled soil. If Brooksby doesn’t currently use regenerative methods, adopting them would help it to become a better sink for greenhouse gases.  Both farms may be able to incorporate agrivoltaics. Agrivoltaics is the combining of traditional fruit and vegetable farming with solar farming.  Dual use of the same piece of land. Think of it!  Not just a single seasonal crop, but one seasonal (food) and one year-round –  clean power.  There are many popular food crops that have been found to grow even better with some shading from solar panels.  Many others do 80 to 90% as well.  And – less water is needed due to plants and soil being partially shaded from daylong hot sun.  Some of the pioneering work being done in the field of agrivoltaics is at our own UMass-Amherst.  Let’s invite one of their team of researchers to town and see how we can replicate their results here.
3. Down at the end of my street (Longview Way in South Peabody) there’s a body of water that connects to the City of Peabody’s Coolidge Water Treatment Facility.  This water surface area could be looked at for a possible floatovoltaics set-up.  Floatovoltaics means floating solar panels on foam rafts.  The panels cast some amount of shade onto the water’s surface, cooling it a bit, so that less algae grows there.  This shading, combined with the water surface area covered by the foam rafts, reduces water losses caused by evaporation.  Worried about locating a solar plant on a public water supply?  One of the world’s largest floatovoltaic plants is located on the reservoir providing London’s water supply with great success.
4. Peabody has a lot of flat, relatively unutilized roof surfaces, such as the North Shore Mall, the Centennial Industrial/Office Park, and elsewhere. The City and PMLP need to bring solar to these rooftops around the city. Many of these same buildings have large parking lots that could also be utilized for renewable energy in the form of carport arrays. Simon Properties, the owners of the North Shore Mall, has many wide-ranging sustainability goals in areas of waste, water, and clean energy.  The City and Simon Properties could work cooperatively in these and other climate-related areas to amplify these efforts.
5. The new Peabody High School in the works should be designed to be an energy-efficiency, green energy showcase. It is large enough to be its own microgrid, creating and storing on-site all of the energy it requires.  In that way, the building itself could become a teacher to all the students attending it.  Let’s work so this building is certified LEED Platinum.  Power it with renewable energy, utilize high efficiency lighting and heat pumps. Let’s model what all new buildings should be striving for in the place where our students can take it all in.
6. Let’s consider “rewilding” our unused green spaces– planting enough different types of trees and other plant life so that it becomes a diverse urban forest, sucking up carbon and other GHGs as it grows to maturity.  Some cities have been able to monetize their forested lands by selling carbon offsets or credits, another perk beyond protecting future generations from the threats of climate collapse.
7. Let the city begin a separate collection of organic waste from all sectors – from homes, businesses, the Mall, schools – wherever it occurs.  It then build an anaerobic digester, a device that will convert that organic waste into biogas plus various liquid and solid byproducts used to replace synthetic fertilizers (a major source of C02) in agriculture. The biogas produced from the digester can be used to heat city buildings.  It could also be used to replace the methane (so-called natural gas) that MMWEC and the PMLP is so determined to burn in this city in its peaker plants. Two companies that look like they are doing marvelous things with biogas to produce greener electricity are Bloom Energy and Mainspring Energy. 
8. Small-scale carbon capture has been coming down in price recently, and this trend is expected to continue. Glenwood Management, which owns apartment buildings in New York City, recently retrofitted its first property with carbon capture equipment from CarbonQuest.  The CarbonQuest CC equipment traps and sequesters carbon from the building’s gas boiler exhaust.  The CO2 is then converted from a gas to liquid form, stored temporarily on-site, then picked up by a tanker truck and delivered to a nearby concrete factory, where it is then injected into new concrete blocks. This both makes the blocks stronger, and also sequesters the carbon indefinitely. While moving away from fossil fuels is necessary, using carbon capture technologies in the meantime is a fantastic way to prevent that carbon from entering the atmosphere. 
9. A year ago, the Peabody City Council opted into the Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) program developed by the US Department of Energy, and administered by the individual states which have adopted it, like Massachusetts. To summarize, private investors put up the money which enables owners of commercial and multi-family residential buildings to install new energy-efficient HVAC equipment, as well as to add renewable energy systems to these properties. Cities themselves don’t have to spend a penny. While Peabody has opted in to the PACE program, no one seems to know much about it or who is promoting it in Peabody. The City Council directed me to the Assessor’s Office and the Department of Community Development and Planning. Those offices said they were aware of PACE, but each also stated that they had no official role in making sure that it is successfully operated in the city. The Peabody Chamber of Commerce was also of little help. While PACE is technically a state program, managed overall by Mass Development, the cities where it has been most successful are those in which the city itself plays an active role in promoting it, making its widespread use a key strategy in its Climate Action Plan funding and financing section. The PACE program is underutilized in Peabody because we do not have municipal leadership promoting it.
10. The City’s elected political establishment, and the board that runs PMLP, need to do more than simply abide by the Commonwealth’s minimum standards. Peabody’s citizens need to encourage, or better yet, demand that the City’s officials do their best in confronting the climate challenge, rather than hoping that a minimum effort will be enough to get by. The Mayor should join hundreds of his counterparts across the country by joining an organization like Climate Mayors. The Peabody City Council’s Ad Hoc Committee on Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy needs to hold frequent and regular meetings. At a minimum, this Ad Hoc Committee must first of all come out strongly for getting a Climate Action Planning process off the ground, including the hiring of a full-time Climate Coordinator, not just assigning additional duties in this all-important area to current City staff members who already have full-time jobs.  Next, the City, via the office of the Mayor and the City Council, in order to show publicly and unequivocally that it really intends to become involved in climate matters, needs to enact a Declaration of Climate Emergency. There are plentiful resources to support the city in these efforts including C40 Cities and ICLEI.

These are just a sample of a plethora of climate actions already proven in other municipalities that Peabody could be taking charge in. In summary, Peabody, while clearly late out of the starting gate, is well-positioned to cease playing the part of the ostrich, and instead to come on late but strong like the great racehorse Seabiscuit.  Seabiscuit, for those who don’t already know the story, was a racehorse that during its career literally went from Worst (one of the worst, anyway) to First.  Despite being a direct descendant of the great winning horse Man O’War, Seabiscuit was both undersized and uncooperative with his earliest trainers, going nowhere on the racing circuit but after a change of trainers, Seabiscuit went on to become one of the greatest racehorses of its era – of any era – even defeating the great War Admiral in the most famous 2-horse race ever held- by four lengths! Seabiscuit was often content, during a race’s earlier stages, to run in the middle or even in the rear of the pack. Then, with a dramatic late-in-the-race kick, he would move to the outside, pass one horse after another, and win the race going away.  It’s time for Peabody, as a City, to shed its ostrich image, and, like Seabiscuit, to move from the back of the pack up to the front among the municipal climate action leaders. It doesn’t have to win the race, but let’s make sure it is at least running.

If you’d like to talk to Mark more about these ideas, or request the full Green Towns Report, please contact him at  markd9x9@gmail.com or visit his website at www.climateplanning.city.